Increate AuraDB Record limit?
Gregory King
Hi Dan, this is currently a hard coded limit based on what it is reasonably safe to stream back to the client. We're working on making what you can return more configurable (still within safe limits).
Right now, if you want to return sets of results further down your result set, you can use the SKIP keyword to, for example skip over the first 5,000 and see the next 5,000.
dan@heslinga.us
Gregory King: Thank you Greg. It's helpful to know that I can use the SKIP keyword. That will give me access to all of the table view. Here are some caveats and suggestions.:
1 - The 5000 node limit prevents me from seeing all of the graph vies (unless you also have a workaround for that). So on AuraDB at least, I'm still stuck.
2 - It would be nice to see the node limit in the online description of the AuraDB free tier.
3 - It would be nice to know which AuraDB paid tier would get me over this limit.
4 - Visualizing this >5000 node network is getting painfully slow In Neo4j Desktop. That's one reason I'm looking at AuraDB. It would be nice to know what sort of memory and RAM I might need to make this visualization workable on my desktop.
I appreciate you and the rest of the Neo4j team.
jit@baanda.com
I am not a neo4j support. I am like you (perhaps) ... learning.